numeric keypunch - traducción al árabe
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

numeric keypunch - traducción al árabe

Numeric tower
  • A representation of the numerical tower with five types of numbers.

numeric keypunch      
مثقبة بلوحة مفاتيح عددية
مثقبة بلوحة مفاتيح عددية      

numeric keypunch

numeric keypad         
  • [[Bluetooth]] Numeric keypad, working also as [[calculator]]
  • Numeric keypad, as a separate unit. For use with a shorter keyboard or laptop which omits the numberpad
SECTION OF A COMPUTER KEYBOARD
NumPad; Number pad; 10-key; Numberpad; Tenkey; Ten key; Numeric pad; Numpad; Numerical keypad
لوحة مفاتيح عددية

Definición

numeric keypad
<hardware> A keypad that has become a standard feature of PC keyboards, consisting of a rectangular array of 17 extra keys at the right-hand end: 0-9, ., Num Lock, /, *, -, + and Enter. Apart from Num Lock, these typically duplicate the function of other keys but are designed to make entering basic numerical calculations as quick as on a digital calculator. It is often possible to assign completely different functions to these keys according to the needs of a particular application. (2007-01-31)

Wikipedia

Numerical tower

In Scheme and in Lisp dialects inspired by it, the numerical tower is a set of data types that represent numbers and a logic for their hierarchical organisation.

Each type in the tower conceptually "sits on" a more fundamental type, so an integer is a rational number and a number, but the converse is not necessarily true, i.e. not every number is an integer. This asymmetry implies that a language can safely allow implicit coercions of numerical types—without creating semantic problems—in only one direction: coercing an integer to a rational loses no information and will never influence the value returned by a function, but to coerce most reals to an integer would alter any relevant computation (e.g., the real 1/3 does not equal any integer) and is thus impermissible.